Benchmarking the Doubleword Control Layer
Benchmarking is hard.
Notes on Building AI Systems
Benchmarking is hard.
How batched, latency-tolerant AI workloads can achieve significantly cheaper token costs using consumer-grade GPUs instead of enterprise hardware like H100s.
Selecting the right AI model for deployment is a critical decision that can significantly impact the performance, cost, and user experience of your application. With a wide variety of models available—each with unique strengths and trade-offs—it’s essential to evaluate them carefully based on relevant criteria. In this post, we’ll explore the three key factors to consider when comparing models for deployment: quality, cost, and speed. Understanding how these factors interact and influence your application will help you make informed choices that align with your technical requirements and business goals
When technology infrastructure—such as GPUs and servers—is owned and managed by a central IT team, the need to allocate costs back to the business units that benefit from these resources becomes a critical consideration. This is particularly relevant in the context of self-hosting AI models, where the initial investment in high-performance GPUs, servers, and supporting infrastructure can be substantial. Without a clear chargeback mechanism, it becomes difficult to ensure accountability, optimize resource usage, and justify the ROI of such investments.
Drawing a parallel between optimizing LLM inference and classical economic principles, specifically the concept of comparative advantage.
Running LLMs at scale can be expensive. Whether you're building customer-facing chatbots, document extraction pipelines, or research tools, token usage can balloon into thousands of dollars quickly. While infrastructure teams often focus on throughput optimizations (batching requests on the GPU, prefix caching, etc.), there's another lever to pull: endpoint design. One of the most powerful - and under-discussed - endpoint types is the batched endpoint. Instead of prioritizing instant responses, batched endpoints trade latency for cost, cutting your LLM bill in half (or more in some cases).
Choosing the right LLM for your workload isn’t just about picking the latest open-source release or switching to a cheaper closed model. If you’re self-hosting language models - whether for RAG pipelines, agents, or fine-tuned data tasks - knowing how good a model is (and compared to what) is a critical decision.
Inference engines are the backbone of self-hosted LLM stacks. They’re responsible for turning model weights into real-time, token-by-token output.
Large Language Models (LLMs) are incredibly powerful but also incredibly resource-hungry. Running them efficiently, especially on self-hosted infrastructure, requires squeezing every bit of performance out of limited compute and memory. That’s where quantization comes in.
AI agents are transforming everything from customer support to autonomous workflows. But under the hood, most AI agent architectures suffer from one major problem: growing latency and cost at scale.
Most retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems assume that documents are clean, structured, and text-based. But in enterprise environments, the reality is different. Documents often contain:
If you’re self-hosting LLMs, scaling out to multiple nodes isn’t optional - and neither is load balancing. But conventional strategies like round-robin or least-connections often fail silently when applied to LLM workloads.